Thursday, September 22nd, 2011
(UPDATE: March, 2012; over time, and with updates to the app, my opinions on Instagram 2.x have changed somewhat; I just posted my updated thoughts on what’s new, what’s changed and what hasn’t – you can read them here. And now, back to the article you wanted to read in the first place…)
Instagram has been my favourite iPhone photo app for about a year now. It doesn’t have the nebulous wealth of filter options of PictureShow or the ubiquitous Hipstamatic but it’s simple, effective, social and fun; the dozen or so filters are varied and distinct; it includes a tilt-shift effect; it exports with just one tap of ‘Save’ to a good variety of sites simultaneously; and it has it’s own little version of Twitter in the Instagram feed where you follow friends or strangers whose Instagrams you appreciate, which works very well.
This week it got a significant 2.0 update adding new filters, live filter and tilt-shift previews before you take your photo, and the option to remove the borders which can change the feel of an image dramatically. It’s also faster and saves much bigger images. Overall that’s a fantastic bunch of new features to add to my favourite photo app.
However, before long something felt very amiss and on closer examination I discovered that I really don’t like it so much after all.
What’s not being mentioned in the press coverage but hasn’t escaped many users on Twitter is that the update also removes three perfectly good filters, Apollo, Poprocket and Gotham; the remaining filters have all been tweaked and feel somehow less than they were – a couple are almost completely different now; most frustratingly the tilt-shift effect has lost a crucial editing option so that at certain settings the effect is ugly to the point of being unusable.
I deleted Instagram 2.0 from my iPhone shortly after updating and synced the prior version from my iTunes computer so I could do a comparison of the two as I suspect plenty people will be interested (read how to do this here). Even if you’re not that bothered about these changes you might be surprised by some of them.
First of all, here’s the example image I’m using in it’s original state, along with the 3 filters that have been removed:
These were all pretty good. I didn’t use Poprocket so much, but Apollo was lovely. Gotham in particular offered a high contrast alternative to Inkwell and was especially good for bright, low contrast scenes (for a better example, see my photo here). Now there is only Inkwell remaining for B&W aficionados and anyone who likes their B&W moody and punchy is out of luck.
Now let’s look at the four new additions:
I can see the variations but seriously, are Amaro, Rise and Valencia anywhere near different enough to each other? Even using this one scene, the removed filters were far more distinctive.
Next, the old and new tilt-shift screens and resulting effect. Look carefully at the transition control.
Both versions allow you to set the size, angle and location of the ‘in focus’ area but the old version also allowed you to feather the transition from soft to sharp and back again using the slider to move the secondary outlines around the focus zone. The new version does not give you this control. Instead, as you pinch to expand or contract the focus zone the app respectively softens or hardens the transition but even at it’s widest it’s pretty noticeable.
In the above example shots the focus zone is the exact same size but I’ve been able to feather the transition in the original version, on the left. If you click on the image to see it larger you’ll notice the new version created a transition that so hard it’s pretty much unusable.
And now the pièce de résistance or, in the Queen’s English, ‘the piece of resistance’:
The new XPro II is a little brighter and contrast is reduced, and in the sky you’ll see that the colour toning is very different.
Lomo-fi is also a little darker but with more shadow detail (reduced contrast). The characteristic blown highlights are gone, leaving something with much less character.
Earlybird now has more shadow detail but is somehow flatter and yellower. (UPDATE: as you’ll read below, this is also the only filter that the Instagram guys have acknowledged is different, for some reason)
Sutro: where do you start? This isn’t even the same filter any more.
Toaster is another one with reduced contrast. The original seemed to glow out of the centre and this one is very flat with a hint of a blue wash.
Brannan feels largely the same; I’d say this one of the few examples of an improvement, with a bit of extra detail and toning in the highlights, and it’s almost imperceptibly punchier.
Inkwell is the only B&W filter on offer now. It’s been brightened slightly which brings out some shadow detail but blows the sky in this shot. I’d say this is an improvement on the previous, flatter version but the lack of a punchier B&W alternative is a real shame.
The new Walden a kind of yellow wash that flattens the contrast, and has lost it’s subtle but pleasing desaturation. It’s quite different.
Hefe is now a little darker and has lost it’s characteristic warmth.
Nashville had a nice washed out 80s fashion photo feel. The new version has lost that and is too contrasty as a result.
1977 also used to have a washed out feeling but has lost it and increased in contrast like Nashville. Notice also that the textures in the original version (see the ‘film blotches’ about two thirds of the way up on either side) are absent in the new version, I’m thinking because they didn’t play nice with the live previews.
Lord Kelvin (or just Kelvin as it’s known now) is completely different. This is such a departure that it really made me think about any possible technical reason to make these changes.
Across the board distinctive elements of each filter have been compromised. Filters that were washed out are now more contrasty. Filters that were contrasty are now more washed out. They’ve all drifted towards the same look.
Instagram said that all the filters have been completely re-written to work with the new live preview system and to output far higher resolution images, and it seems to me the re-writes just haven’t nailed the original look. I have a feeling this may be for technical reasons, that the new engine for live preview just can’t support certain features like textures. I suppose it’s also possible the Instagram guys wanted to make some tweaks deliberately but if they did then that’s not cool in my opinion. Users preferring the social side may not mind much, but I had some favourite filters that just don’t feel the same at all and I know I’m not alone.
The higher resolution output also contributes subtly to the loss of character. Instagram seeks to replicate old school film and camera effects which almost all thrive on their lack of perfection. The original version’s lower res lent a barely perceptible softness to the finer details which helped sell their retro film pretensions, a quality which is noticeable now by it’s absence. Every image Instagram 2.0 produces is as full of detail as the original image and that’s a problem. If there was a way to cheat a little imperfection back into the details somehow that would be interesting.
But the big problems are the changes to the filters and the tilt-shift tool. I think the latter is something that could and definitely should be changed and if you’re reading this, guys, that would be awesome. However the filters have been changed, and for whatever reason, they just aren’t quite on the money yet, some painfully so.
And as for the new filters, they feel so similar in tone that the loss of the Instagram Three is even more keenly felt as they were so full of character, something which the whole selection now seems to lack a little of.
For the time being I think I’m going to go back to the last version I have saved in iTunes (again, instructions here). I know I haven’t ever had to pay anything to use this app and so it’s not like I’m particularly entitled to ‘my’ app, but I didn’t really take the Instagram guys to be the iOS incarnation of George Lucas either – and I still don’t really because I love the app too much. I’m hoping they hear some of the feedback and see what they can do with it.
22nd September: The @instagram Twitter account just posted this link to notice of an update to 2.1 coming soon. Two notes relevant to this review:
Earlybird looks more like old version
In v2.0, the Earlybird filter was altered slightly. This was unintentional and in v2.1 we’ve restored the filter back to its original state.Tilt-shift has softer cutoff
We noticed the blur on tilt-shift in v2.0 was more intense when applied after capture. In v2.1, we’ve made the tilt-shift preview consistent between screens and less intense.
I’m surprised that Earlybird is the one being singled out given how different nearly all the other filters are. I also don’t think there’s any need to do anything with the tilt-shift except put the transition/gradient slider back in.
25th September: I notice now that the Instagram support page contains a couple of references to both the missing filters and the Tiltshift gradient tool:
I can’t find the Gotham, Poprocket, or Apollo filters
The Gotham, Poprocket and Apollo filters were replaced by 4 new filters in V2.0 of Instagram. We understand that there are fans of these filters in the Instagram community and in future releases we hope to introduce improved versions that capture the essence of these filters.I can’t adjust the tilt shift gradient
In designing the new camera interface, we strived to keep the app as simple as possible. In keeping with this, we thought it was a reasonable tradeoff to remove the ability to adjust the tilt shift effect. If you have feedback on this feature, we’d appreciate if you could send us an email with details.
I’ve sent a detailed but polite email to them outlining my main concerns with the filters, the live preview feature and the tilt-shift tool and if you feel strongly about any of these I would encourage you to do the same – but do be polite! Nobody responds well to an angry or abusive email.
September 26th: I mention in the comments below that you can’t change a filter after you shoot like you used to be able to, and that having to choose before you shoot ruins the spontaneity. I’ve been playing with the app today and I’m happy and a trifle sheepish to admit
I was wrong!
You can choose a filter before you shoot if you want but after you shoot you can also change your choice, so it’s the best of both worlds.
This large oversight of mine actually makes me slightly less disappointed in the update. But only a little bit, mind… ;)
Thanks for reading. If you’d like to comment on anything I’m @myglasseye on Twitter.
[...] aren’t too happy about the changes that were done to their beloved filters. Owen Billcliffe over at My Glass Eye did a side-by-side comparison between old and new filters to show the differences. The filter shown [...]
This was an excellent article. I felt, almost right away, that something was funny about the filters in 2.0. Now, thanks to your comparison, I see the difference. I’m going to downgrade to my saved version of 1.x.
By the way, daniel, that’s a good point about the resolution. It feels slower to upload and I’ve had a few too many times it fails. #Instagrumble
[...] reads about the same feelings (that specifically sum it up better than i could…): http://www.myglasseye.net/news/2011/09/instagram-2-0-review-insta-grumble/ [...]
Another example of a completely clueless company who thinks users need them rather than the other way around. Instagram makes sharing of images easy – but the what the morons in charge don’t understand is that it’s through the filters that the users make their emotional connection to the world that they are sharing.
Instagram is dead.
I noticed this too. Redownloaded Hipstamatic, and the filters are now of so much higher quality there, compared to Instagram 2.0. I’ll probably use that one instead now, or some other app for this.
I don’t think the Instagram team will have an easy time reverting these changes, since their new live engine probably don’t support the details giving the filters character, and just the “big picture” of the respective filters.
So no high hopes here. Good there are many fun options. :)
Great write up! Thanks for the side by side comparison.
Shame with that we lost the trio filters. What ticked me first was that IG didn’t say anything about these changes ‘before’ they had the upgrade.
I think many people would’ve been happier if they told us what have changed so that they could make an informed decision whether to upgrade or not, rather than scrambling to restore the old one.
Having said that @kevin himself told me that we should move forward and he promises to work hard towards more cool stuff (check it out here http://statigr.am/viewer.php#/detail/233014606_118355).
Btwy, one last thing that has changed is that we are not able anymore to save the filtered photo without uploading it (without doing a workaround), which was a nice ‘back-door’ on the old version.
Cheers,
Chris
[...] Il problema con il nuovo Instagr.am → [...]
I also restored the old version. The feathering option for Tilt-Shift was the most often used filter for me.
[...] clear warning to me before I upgraded to Instagram 2.0 that they were going to be removed. And that many of the ones which stayed, although named the same, were going to be so completely different. LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); [...]
[...] watered down compared to the filters in previous verions of the app. Blogger Owen Billcliffe wrote a highly detailed critique of the new filters, using side-by-side comparisons to show that many of them were indeed visually [...]
[...] watered down compared to the filters in previous verions of the app. Blogger Owen Billcliffe wrote a highly detailed critique of the new filters, using side-by-side comparisons to show that many of them were indeed visually [...]
[...] watered down compared to the filters in previous verions of the app. Blogger Owen Billcliffe wrote a highly detailed critique of the new filters, using side-by-side comparisons to show that many of them were indeed visually [...]
[...] usuarios que expresaron su decepción a través de Internet. Varios blogs de fotografía como My Glass Eye, Petapixel o Fotografiad destacan los negativo de los cambios en los filtros e Incluso Charlie [...]
Removing the ability to save the filtered image without uploading to IG is very frustrating.
Also who would use live preview anyway, 99% of the time you shoot first, then apply filter. The light or that expression on someone’s face will not wait while you trying out the filters. Absolutely useless feature.
can’t see the changes in Instagram. I have ios 4.2.1 please help
maybe after Brbn has collected tons o’ funding, some stupid venture capitalist is now forcing them to water down the app, in order to make it more “commercial”. if that’s the case, we’re screwed.
um, i think the Looo Fi & XPro II definitely improved. the old versions are too dark & high contrast.
*lomo
Kelvin became the worst out of all changes. it’s not the unique Kelvin anymore ugh
[...] to: next to sporting a higher resolution and some new filters that was about it. And even although some filters in Instagram 2 where kinda FUBAR, Instagram took the hit standing as people already were in love with the [...]
Good review. Well-written. A bit biased perhaps? I started using IG with v2.0 and must say that I’m happy about the changes of filters. I didn’t like most of the originals in the side-by-side comparison.
Probably a question of habit?
Well it’s not a review really, it’s a criticism of the update so yes, it is by it’s nature completely biased by my opinions ;)